I was watching the speeches last night in New Hampshire. It seemed to me that Obama became very preachy and for some reason I couldn't tell if I could trust him after hearing him speak and looking at his eyes when he spoke. He also wasn't really talking about anything new than what every other democratic candidate plans to do in office. it seemed like he was double talking when he said three things: "we will bring our troops home, we will get the job done." But then he said "we will get Al Quaida". So my question is: is he for the war or against it? How would you interpret that. Do you really think he can get al quaida while bringing our troops home? Here are some of the similarities and difference I noticed between the two tell me what you think. Obama seems to really care, he is youthful, vibrant, and unrehearsed. This makes him more of a wild card though. Can we trust that. Clinton also seemed to care, but she was also more rehearsed, more practiced and more confident.
Is it just me or does it seem like Obama and Clinton are total opposites?
Yup, you can read a lot into the body language.
Obama is unsure about himself.
His speeches are greatly peppered with uncertainties.
Hillary is no spring chicken.
She's a seasoned political fighter.
That's why she would be most suited for the job after Bush leaves the office. She would be TOUGH enough to clean up after the slob.
Hillary may be unlikeable but she gets things done.
Reply:Obama has never talked about anything substantial. In fact, he is clueless. He proposes a healthcare plan that would still leave millions out, he talks about building more nuke plants instead of green energy, he told a lady in the audience that vets should continue to be required to only have VA coverage, he wants to give driver's licenses to illegals. He's not about change.
It's just a bunch of inexperienced, foolish white college kids that cheer for him in hopes of making black friends.
Reply:They are alreay opposites by their gender, but they are completly different by their morals and they way they want to run our country.
Reply:They're two different people with the same ideas.
It's only the external packaging and the presentation that are different.
Reply:it's just you - they are very much alike they just have to come off as being different now because they are in a race against each other
barack is against the war and so is hillary
Reply:Obama still needs to prove himself. Hilary has made many positive changes and she is very well spoken. They are very different. Obama is still very wet behind the ears and I just do not trust him. I trust him as much as I trust Bush Jr.
Reply:They are siimilar, and it is more a matter of style over substance.
Reply:just you. lol ;)
Reply:there not alike thats fursure and as many say, i dont trust him either but i have problems because he is african/american, now iam not a racist but all the blacks could turn on us because in the past they have been done wrong by whites, thats the only reason. sorry i said that and i have to think about that, now racism is not as bad as it was years ago but it still goes on now. no i dont trust him but then i dont trust no one sorry. have a nice day.
Reply:I know what you mean, but I don't think they are total opposites. I actually think they'd make a great team if they could do so ... well, I suppose that they likely will work together again, huh?
I can definetely understand how Obama wants the troops home, but also determines to "get Al Qaida." The
troops were sent there on bogus claims from a greedy
devisive administration. A more directed mission with
a better plan can "get Al Qaida."
They DO need to come home, but our military is fully
capable of an honest mission against terror. The way
we are going about it now is taking more lives than saving.
He does seem to really care and have integrity. He used
to be my senator when I lived in Illinois and I've been
in his presence half a dozen times. Very honest, integritous,
sincere, charismatic, well thinking, intelligent, fair and determined. Stout enough to help make this country as honorable and noble as we were always intended from the start.
Peace.
Reply:Black male, White woman, yup I would say you are on the right track.
Reply:Yes and No, they are both liberals but one is old school of thought and the other has a scary modern mentality..Neither has balance and that's what we need in office is balance ..We need the same old principals, morals and standards this country was founded on because they never change and are practical, but we need an individual with a twist and the understanding of the worlds needs and issues of today..
You can't just patch things up and close your eyes..We need tough solutions to hardcore problems that man has screwed up thus far.. Obama is a showman but I don't think he's the right material for the commander and chief ..We need to bring back the one entity back that man has done his hardest to deny and that would be God himself.. Obama doesn't have a clue what that would mean or entail ...
War is war and has been around since the beginning of the population of the world..It can create peace and raise standards and it plucks the tares from their roots... War will always be with us as long as the earth abides forever along with everything in it! What we do have to look forward to at some point is the manifestation of the sons of God and the end of the ages..Whatever that looks like?
Reply:Just you, they are both out of DNC central casting.
Reply:They are both antichrists!!!
Reply:The main difference is that Obama is a human being.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment