Clinton is losing, but what if she....?

OK lets face it. Clinton is in a really bad position right now. She can't hurt Obama with charages of plagiarism, of his inexperience, of him using the "race card", and of him being all flash but no substance. But what is she points out that when Obama was state legislator, he often chose "present" instead of a "yes" or "no" vote? Clearly, it can show that Obama is a rather indecisive politician. Why doesn't she criticize him on that?

Clinton is losing, but what if she....?
She already brought that up in OTHER debates. he explained that in Illinois, if you wanted a bill to be re-edited, you have to choose present! Saying yes or no on it means you cannot re-edit that bill..





That's the way it works..so she couldn't knock him on that!
Reply:Because she has bad campaign staff.
Reply:She has... And it didn't work..
Reply:She can't cast too many stones, since she is running on 35 years of experience that doesn't exist! So what if she was first lady in Arkansas and the US. That doesn't count as experience. Obviously she didn't stay close to Bill and confide in him and he in her--otherwise she would have kept him in line from cheating on her. I don't count years as a corporate lawyer as experience either. She has only the experience in the Senate, and her bills she has championed have no substance, just like her. I have heard her speak in person, and came away with "huh?"--she had nothing to do but speak--ironically the charge she levels against Mr. Obama. In a couple of weeks she will be out of the picture.
Reply:because she knows she is losing, i don't get why she just doesn't quit
Reply:Good question, but the trouble is, she's so far behind now, I don't think it'll make any difference WHAT she does. Stick a fork in her, she's done!
Reply:You should research the present choice that Illinois has in their voting process. It means different things in different states. She has also missed several votes, especially when the campaigning started.
Reply:Her only problem is the media should be the one questioning him. It should not be up to her but they refuse to touch him. But the are more then willing to say negatives about her
Reply:She's the most indecisive politician I have ever seen.





When will the people actually see that they both suck. The only politician that is fighting for the people is Ron Paul. Call him racist call him crazy but the man is trying to save the people from the power of the banks.
Reply:because most of his supporters could care less about his record or his plans
Reply:Sadly enough, those who support Obama are strictly doing so because of his skin color. He doesn't stand for anything but the vague term of change. And what could be the complete opposite of Bush? A young black man with no experience and a good speaker. At this point, he has too much momentum to be stopped on the Democratic side. Hilary should just go back to chasing violent video games.
Reply:A politician that shows up and does nothing, how harmless is that? You may have very well talked me into voting for him.





Look at it this way, everybody knows about the tiger that escaped from the San Francisco zoo. Did you know a tiger also escaped at the Honolulu zoo? The reason that didn't make news was that the tiger just went for a stroll, he voted present, rather than voting, yes I'll eat that human, or no I won't refrain from eating that human. Isn't that a much nicer tiger? Governments work that way too.
Reply:After March 4 Texas and Ohio Primaries Clinton will be the nominee for sure!





Texas for Clinton.

riding boots